Isu Terkini Euthanasia Antara Hak Hidup dan Hak Menentukan Pilihan: Systematic Literature Review

Current Issues in Euthanasia Between the Right to Life and the Right to Choose: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Muhammad Alfi Reza Puskesmas Tanralili, Maros, Indonesia
  • Fathannia Rizky Diennillah Klinik Pratama UNHAS Baraya, Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52103/jahr.v4i1.1712

Keywords:

Euthanasia, Dilemma, Ethics, Moral, Legal

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Euthanasia up to now, there are still no regulations or regulations that are legally implemented and apply in Indonesia, including criminal responsibility for the perpetrator or family who wants euthanasia. Currently, euthanasia is discussed more often and is equated with the action of a doctor or health worker who carries out the act or act of injecting a patient to death at the request of the patient himself or at the request of the victim's family. There are various opinions about the pros and cons of euthanasia, including being faced with two difficult choices, namely the right to life and the right to make choices.

Aim: This research aims to explore the act of euthanasia, both active and passive, along with ethical and moral dilemmas

Method: The method used in this writing is a literature review which is a systematic, explicit and reproducible method for identifying, evaluating and synthesizing research works and ideas that have been produced by researchers and practitioners.

Results: The research results show that euthanasia is an ethical and moral dilemma in the code of ethics of health professionals because they are faced with a difficult choice between complying or not complying with requests from the patient/family directly and indirectly. Passive euthanasia is still ethically acceptable with several considerations, but active euthanasia is opposed to being carried out on ethical, moral and legal grounds. The right to life must not be revoked arbitrarily or "arbitrarily deprived" which is implemented by limiting the scope of this right, and therefore it is the state's duty to ensure the right to life. Countries that allow euthanasia must provide effective safety procedures so that it is not used as an abuse.

Conclusion: Euthanasia is an ethical and moral dilemma in the code of ethics for health professionals because they are faced with a difficult choice between complying or not complying with requests from the patient/family directly and indirectly. Passive euthanasia is still ethically acceptable with several considerations, but active euthanasia is opposed on ethical, moral and legal grounds.

References

Nugraha X, Adiguno S, Yulfa S, Lathifah Y. 2021. Analisis Potensi Legalisasi Eutanasia Di Indonesia : Diskursus Antara Hak Hidup Dengan Hak Menentukan Pilihan. Univ Bengkulu Law J. 6(1):39-59. doi:10.33369/ubelaj.6.1.39-59

Emina KA. Legal, Social and Ethical Issues in Euthanasia. 2021. J Sos J Has Pemikiran, Penelit dan Pengemb Keilmuan Sosiol Pendidik. (3):53. doi:10.26858/sosialisasi.v0i3.19963

Gutierrez-Castillo A, Gutierrez-Castillo J, Guadarrama-Conzuelo F, Jimenez-Ruiz A, Ruiz-Sandoval JL. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: 2020. A systematic review of medical students’ attitudes in the last 10 years. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 13(22):1-13. doi:10.18502/jmehm.v13i22.4864

Palliative Care Australia. 2018. Experience internationally of the legalisation of assisted dying on the palliative care sector. (October). https://palliativecare.org.au/download/12763/

Fontalis A, Prousali E, Kulkarni K. 2018. Euthanasia and assisted dying: what is the current position and what are the key arguments informing the debate? J R Soc Med. doi:10.1177/0141076818803452

Clarke C, Cannon M, Skokauskas N, Twomey P. 2021. The debate about physician assisted suicide and euthanasia in Ireland – Implications for psychiatry. Int J Law Psychiatry. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101747

Pradjonggo TS. 2016. Suntik Mati ( Euthanasia ) Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum. J Ilm Pendidik Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan.

Fay, D. L. 1967. Edward theory. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 10–42

No R. 2021. A Legal Framework for Voluntary Assisted Dying Report Summary.

Azzuri P, Azzuri P, Prasetyo H. 2021. Tindakan Euthanasia Pasif Oleh Dokter Terhadap Pasien Di Indonesia. JUSTITIA J Ilmu Huk dan Hum. 8(4):717-728. http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/Justitia/article/view/2765

Suryadi T, Kulsum K. Aspek Etika Dan Legal Euthanasia. 2018. J Kedokt Syiah Kuala. doi:10.24815/jks.v18i3.18022

Mendzhul M V., Badyda AY, Fetko YI, Fridmanskyy RM, Fridmanska VI. 2021. Eutanasia: legal regulation in european countries and prospects for legalization in Ukraine. Laplage Em Rev;7(3):479-486. doi:10.24115/s2446-62202021731334p.479-486

Pereira Mbchb Msc J. 2011. Legalizing euthanasia or assisted suicide: the illusion of safeguards and controls. Curr Oncol;18(2):38-45. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3070710/pdf/conc-18-e38.pdf

Wekesa M, Awori M. 2020. The State of the Law on Euthanasia in Kenya. J Med Law Ethics;8(1):1-14. doi:10.7590/221354020x15922956412951

Alias F, Jahn Kassim PN. 2021. Legal Aspects of End-of-Life Care in Malaysia. Mlj.2:xxxiii.

Library P. Assisted Dying: Overseas Parliaments - New Zealand Parliament. 2018. December):1-10. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/library-research-papers/research-papers/assisted-dying-overseas-parliaments/

Groenewoud AS, Atsma F, Arvin M, Westert GP, Boer TA. 2021. Euthanasia in the Netherlands: A claims data cross-sectional study of geographical variation. BMJ Support Palliat Care. Published online:1-11. doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002573

Salinas Mengual J. 2019. Relationship Between COVID-19, Euthanasia and Old Age: A Study from a Legal-Ethical Perspective. J Relig Health;60(4):2250-2284. doi:10.1007/s10943-021-01280-z

White BP, Willmott L. 2020. Evidence-based law making on voluntary assisted dying. Aust Heal Rev. 44(4):582-589. doi:10.1071/AH19201

Van Den Berg V, Van Thiel G, Zomers M, et al. 2018. Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in Patients with Multiple Geriatric Syndromes. JA

Downloads

Published

2023-06-18

How to Cite

Reza, M. A., & Diennillah, F. R. (2023). Isu Terkini Euthanasia Antara Hak Hidup dan Hak Menentukan Pilihan: Systematic Literature Review: Current Issues in Euthanasia Between the Right to Life and the Right to Choose: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Aafiyah Health Research (JAHR), 4(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.52103/jahr.v4i1.1712

Most read articles by the same author(s)