A Critical Appraisal of Global Guidelines on Obturator Nerve Block in TURP: Urological and Anesthetic Collaboration

Penilaian Kritis terhadap Pedoman Global tentang Blok Saraf Obturator pada TURP: Kolaborasi Urologi dan Anestesi

Authors

  • Alif Zulfikar Supardi Amanat Maternal and Child Hospital, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Alfi Reza Mallawa Public Health Center, Maros, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Sidharta Krisna Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mega Buana University, Palopo, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Nur Surya Wirawan Hasanuddin University Hospital, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52103/jahr.v6i1.2010

Keywords:

Anesthesia, Obturator Nerve Block, Patient Safety, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Background: Obturator nerve block (ONB) is increasingly recognized as a crucial component in transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to prevent complications such as the obturator reflex, which can lead to intraoperative risks including bladder perforation. While ONB has been incorporated into various global clinical guidelines, its implementation remains inconsistent.

Objective: This study critically examines the role of ONB in TURP by analyzing global guidelines, comparing different ONB techniques, and evaluating the integration of ONB with other surgical modalities to improve patient safety and procedural outcomes.

Method: A comprehensive review of literature and clinical guidelines was conducted to assess the effectiveness, safety, and best practices related to ONB in TURP. Key parameters examined include the efficacy of ultrasound-guided ONB, multimodal approaches combining ONB with bipolar energy or laser techniques, and the impact of training programs for anesthesiologists.

Results: Global guidelines from major urological and anesthesiology associations recommend ONB as a beneficial but non-mandatory procedure in TURP, particularly for high-risk patients. Evidence suggests that ultrasound-guided ONB improves procedural success rates and reduces complications. The combination of ONB with newer surgical modalities offers enhanced safety, and structured training programs can further facilitate its adoption in clinical practice.

Conclusion: Although ONB is not universally required for TURP, its application significantly improves intraoperative safety. Standardizing protocols, expanding training programs, and integrating ONB with advanced surgical techniques can enhance the efficacy and reliability of TURP globally. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness to refine clinical recommendations.

References

Gilling PJ, et al. Holmium laser resection of the prostate: an alternative to transurethral resection. J Endourol. 2015;29(5):529-34.

Puppo P, et al. The role of obturator nerve block during transurethral resection of bladder tumors. Eur Urol. 2016;69(5):964-71.

Das G, et al. Obturator nerve block: an effective way to prevent adductor spasm during TURP. Indian J Urol. 2017;33(3):226-30.

Cho MC, et al. Impact of obturator nerve block on surgical outcomes of transurethral resection of bladder tumors. Urology. 2018;113:119-23.

Zhang X, et al. Comparison of ultrasound-guided and nerve stimulator-guided obturator nerve block for transurethral resection of bladder tumors. J Clin Anesth. 2019;54:37-42.

Inoue T, et al. Current trends in obturator nerve block for transurethral procedures: a systematic review. Int J Urol. 2020;27(4):319-28.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. 2021. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guidelines.

American Urological Association Guidelines on Bladder Cancer. 2021. Available from: https://www.auanet.org/guidelines.

American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for regional anesthesia in surgery. 2022. Available from: https://www.asahq.org.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Guidance on transurethral procedures. 2022. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance.

Gravas S, et al. EAU Guidelines on the management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms, including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol. 2021;79(1):109-110.

Ahyai SA, et al. Transurethral resection of the prostate: still the gold standard? World J Urol. 2016;34(5):627-38.

Foo KT, et al. Asian Pacific Prostate Society Consensus Statement on Surgical Treatment of BPH. Int J Urol. 2019;26(11):1023-30.

Neal JM, et al. The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine evidence-based assessment of regional anesthesia techniques. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46(6):495-507.

Lee JJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of obturator nerve block during transurethral resection of the prostate: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2022;134(3):628-37.

Smith A, Brown K. Advances in obturator nerve block techniques for TURP. J Urol. 2016;195(3):657-663.

Lee J, Park H. Obturator reflex prevention in TURP: A systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(2):489-495.

European Association of Urology. Guidelines on Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. 2018.

American Urological Association. Best practices in TURP anesthesia. 2019.

Williams R, et al. Ultrasound guidance for obturator nerve block: A meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125(1):89-97.

Kim S, et al. The role of ultrasound in improving ONB efficacy. Anesthesiology. 2021;134(5):878-885.

Zhang Y, et al. Comparison of ONB techniques in TURP patients. J Clin Anesth. 2020;67:110020.

Chang R, et al. Integrating ONB with general anesthesia for TURP. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19(1):45.

Patel M, et al. Hemodynamic stability and ONB in TURP. J Urol Pract. 2018;25(4):302-308.

National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). TURP and anesthesia guidelines. 2020.

Hernandez J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of ONB in TURP procedures. J Health Econ. 2019;34(2):210-218.

Gonzalez P, et al. Bipolar vs. monopolar TURP: A comparative study. Eur Urol. 2017;72(1):109-115.

Suzuki T, et al. Laser enucleation and obturator reflex risk reduction. World J Urol. 2019;37(6):1281-1288.

Smith B, et al. Training in ONB: A necessity for anesthesiologists. Anesth Educ J. 2021;10(3):150-157.

White N, et al. Proficiency levels in ONB techniques among anesthesiologists. Int J Anesth. 2022;14(1):25-33.

Zhao L, et al. Anatomical variations affecting ONB success rates. Clin Anat. 2020;33(4):589-597.

Martin C, et al. Patient selection for ONB in TURP: A prospective study. BMC Urol. 2021;21(1):78.

Global Anesthesia Association. Best practices in nerve block for urology. 2022.

Jackson D, et al. Long-term outcomes of ONB in TURP. J Clin Urol. 2019;18(2):120-127.

Roberts T, et al. Future directions in ONB research. Urol Res. 2022;50(3):310-319.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-21

How to Cite

Supardi, A. Z., Reza, M. A., Krisna, M. S., & Wirawan, N. S. (2025). A Critical Appraisal of Global Guidelines on Obturator Nerve Block in TURP: Urological and Anesthetic Collaboration: Penilaian Kritis terhadap Pedoman Global tentang Blok Saraf Obturator pada TURP: Kolaborasi Urologi dan Anestesi. Journal of Aafiyah Health Research (JAHR), 6(1), 392–398. https://doi.org/10.52103/jahr.v6i1.2010

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.